Civic Result MapsEvidence & records timeline
Evidence & Records Timeline
National evidence and records timeline
This timeline organizes source-backed records, review questions, and evidence gaps. Missing, partial, denied, delayed, or constrained records do not establish fraud or misconduct; they identify where independent reconciliation still needs source evidence.
Record categories
What each tracked record can help reconcile
Why this record might matter
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Other explanations to check
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Why this record might matter
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Other explanations to check
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Why this record might matter
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Other explanations to check
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Why this record might matter
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Other explanations to check
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Why this record might matter
Request records document what was sought, which office holds it, response timing, fees or exemptions, and any remaining access gap.
Other explanations to check
Records-request delays can also come from normal queue backlogs, fee estimates, custodian handoffs, legal review, holidays, or unclear public-records procedures.
Why this record might matter
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Other explanations to check
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Evidence and records stream
85 records visibleHistorical voting-system concern
Smart Elections: ExpressVote XL machine concern letterALL / external context / machine logs
source noteWhere are ExpressVote XL systems used in current election data, and what audit evidence is needed to evaluate machine-count questions in those jurisdictions?
- Scope
- voting-system context
- Status
- Smart Elections' dated ExpressVote XL letter is added as historical voting-system context for jurisdictions using ballot-marking/tabulation systems that may require machine-log and audit follow-up.
- Evidence needed
- Certification records, risk-limiting audit compatibility evidence, voter-verifiable paper record guidance, and jurisdiction-specific ExpressVote XL deployment records.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Pre-election system test
Arizona: Logic and accuracy recordsAZ / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Logic and accuracy recordsElectronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPre-election system test
Georgia: Logic and accuracy recordsGA / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPre-election system test
Massachusetts: Logic and accuracy recordsMA / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known President and U.S. Senate test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPre-election system test
Michigan: Logic and accuracy recordsMI / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPre-election system test
North Carolina: Logic and accuracy recordsNC / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPre-election system test
Nevada: Logic and accuracy recordsNV / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPre-election system test
Pennsylvania: Logic and accuracy recordsPA / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPre-election system test
Texas: Logic and accuracy recordsTX / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Logic and accuracy recordsElectronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPre-election system test
Wisconsin: Logic and accuracy recordsWI / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDid test decks and configuration evidence show the system counted known ballots correctly?
- Scope
- test deck or testing jurisdiction
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to confirm voting systems counted known test ballots as configured before the election.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonExternal 2024 election review prompt
Smart Elections: 2024 election updateALL / external review / results
source noteWhich jurisdictions and contests drive the drop-off questions Smart Elections flags, and do official precinct-level records support a benign explanation?
- Scope
- national 2024 general-election review
- Status
- Smart Elections maintains a 2024 election update page focused on drop-off questions. This timeline records the page as a source-backed review prompt, not as a confirmed finding.
- Evidence needed
- Official precinct results, certified canvass records, CVRs where available, turnout files, and post-election audit records that can confirm or reject the questioned drop-off pattern.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
External county drop-off comparison
Smart Elections: county drop-off reviewALL / external review / results
source noteWhich counties appear most anomalous in Smart Elections' county drop-off page, and are those counties explainable by official ballot-style or turnout evidence?
- Scope
- county-level drop-off review
- Status
- Smart Elections publishes a county drop-off page for the 2024 election. This creates a county-prioritization point for official-record reconciliation.
- Evidence needed
- County canvass exports, precinct-level results, ballot-style data, and official turnout totals that explain county-level presidential drop-off patterns.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
External multi-state drop-off comparison
Smart Elections: multi-state drop-off comparisonALL / external review / results
source noteDo the multi-state drop-off comparisons remain unusual after controlling for race visibility, uncontested contests, undervotes, ballot order, and county reporting practices?
- Scope
- multi-state drop-off comparison
- Status
- Smart Elections publishes a multi-state 2024 general-presidential drop-off comparison. The entry marks the comparison as a hypothesis to test against official local data.
- Evidence needed
- Contest-level and precinct-level official results, ballot roll-off baselines, turnout by voting method, and comparable down-ballot contest data.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Custody and media handling
Arizona: Custody recordsAZ / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, and removable-media handling around any machine-output anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Custody recordsElectronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonCustody and media handling
Georgia: Custody recordsGA / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, and removable-media handling around any machine-output anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonCustody and media handling
Massachusetts: Custody recordsMA / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, hand-count, optical-scan, and removable-media handling around any municipality-level anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonCustody and media handling
Michigan: Custody recordsMI / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, and removable-media handling around any machine-output anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonCustody and media handling
North Carolina: Custody recordsNC / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, and removable-media handling around any machine-output anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonCustody and media handling
Nevada: Custody recordsNV / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, and removable-media handling around any machine-output anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonCustody and media handling
Pennsylvania: Custody recordsPA / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, and removable-media handling around any machine-output anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonCustody and media handling
Texas: Custody recordsTX / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, and removable-media handling around any machine-output anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonCustody and media handling
Wisconsin: Custody recordsWI / needs data / custody
follow-upCan custody, seals, transport, and storage explain any machine-output anomaly?
- Scope
- ballot equipment media
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to explain custody, seal, transport, storage, and removable-media handling around any machine-output anomaly.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonLocal result localization
Arizona: Reporting-unit resultsAZ / partial / results
source noteCan suspicious patterns be localized below statewide or county totals?
- Scope
- county
- Status
- county only not subcounty
- Evidence needed
- County-only rows cannot localize machine or batch anomalies.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Reporting-unit resultsLocal artifact
data/az-2024-general-canvass-senate.csvLocal result localization
Nevada: Reporting-unit resultsNV / partial / results
source noteCan suspicious patterns be localized below statewide or county totals?
- Scope
- clark washoe humboldt precinct cvr plus statewide county
- Status
- clark washoe humboldt precinct cvr loaded other counties county only
- Evidence needed
- Clark, Washoe, and Humboldt precinct rows can localize review screens inside those counties; other counties still need local reporting-unit results.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Reporting-unit resultsLocal artifact
data/nv-clark-2024-general-cvr-precinct-review.csvLocal result localization
Texas: Reporting-unit resultsTX / partial / results
source noteCan suspicious patterns be localized below statewide or county totals?
- Scope
- vtd
- Status
- vtd president senate review loaded generic write in scope gap 15854
- Evidence needed
- VTD President/Senate comparison can localize advisory patterns. The presidential VTD aggregate is 15,854 votes above the SOS certified county package primarily because VTD rows carry 24,730 generic Write-In votes while SOS certified rows carry 8,569 named declared write-in votes.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Reporting-unit resultsLocal artifact
data/tx-2024-general-vtds-election-data.zipBallot-image reconciliation
Arizona: Ballot image recordsAZ / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare voter-mark interpretation against CVR or tabulator interpretation where public or lawfully obtainable.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Ballot image recordsElectronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
Arizona: Cast vote recordsAZ / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- ballot
- Status
- not inventoried no cvr loaded
- Evidence needed
- Needed for independent ballot-level retabulation and comparison to certified totals.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Cast vote recordsElectronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-image reconciliation
Georgia: Ballot image recordsGA / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare voter-mark interpretation against CVR or tabulator interpretation where public or lawfully obtainable.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
Georgia: Cast vote recordsGA / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- ballot
- Status
- not inventoried no cvr loaded
- Evidence needed
- Needed for independent ballot-level retabulation and comparison to certified totals.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-image reconciliation
Massachusetts: Ballot image recordsMA / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed where public or lawfully obtainable to compare voter-mark interpretation against CVR or tabulator interpretation in municipalities with large President-versus-Senate gaps.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
Massachusetts: Cast vote recordsMA / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- ballot
- Status
- not inventoried no cvr loaded
- Evidence needed
- Needed to retabulate presidential and U.S. Senate selections by ballot, precinct, vote method, batch, ballot style, and tabulator to separate normal candidate-specific roll-off from machine-output anomalies.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-image reconciliation
Michigan: Ballot image recordsMI / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare voter-mark interpretation against CVR or tabulator interpretation where public or lawfully obtainable.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
Michigan: Cast vote recordsMI / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- ballot
- Status
- not inventoried no cvr loaded
- Evidence needed
- Needed for independent ballot-level retabulation and comparison to certified totals.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-image reconciliation
North Carolina: Ballot image recordsNC / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare voter-mark interpretation against CVR or tabulator interpretation where public or lawfully obtainable.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
North Carolina: Cast vote recordsNC / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- ballot
- Status
- not inventoried no cvr loaded
- Evidence needed
- Needed for independent ballot-level retabulation and comparison to certified totals.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-image reconciliation
Nevada: Ballot image recordsNV / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare voter-mark interpretation against CVR or tabulator interpretation where public or lawfully obtainable.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
Nevada: Cast vote recordsNV / partial / paper evidence
source noteCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- clark washoe humboldt ballot cvr normalized to precinct review
- Status
- clark washoe humboldt cvr normalized certified county delta possible other counties not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Clark, Washoe, and Humboldt CVRs support precinct aggregation and review; full ballot-level retabulation still requires raw CVR handling and other county availability inventory.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Cast vote recordsLocal artifact
data/nv-clark-2024-general-cvr-precinct-review.csvBallot-image reconciliation
Pennsylvania: Ballot image recordsPA / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare voter-mark interpretation against CVR or tabulator interpretation where public or lawfully obtainable.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
Pennsylvania: Cast vote recordsPA / blocked / paper evidence
priorityCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- ballot
- Status
- public release legally constrained not loaded
- Evidence needed
- CVR retabulation would be useful but should be tracked as constrained until an official lawful source is confirmed.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-image reconciliation
Texas: Ballot image recordsTX / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare voter-mark interpretation against CVR or tabulator interpretation where public or lawfully obtainable.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
Texas: Cast vote recordsTX / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- ballot
- Status
- not inventoried no cvr loaded
- Evidence needed
- Needed for independent ballot-level retabulation and comparison to certified totals and VTD/reporting-unit rows.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-image reconciliation
Wisconsin: Ballot image recordsWI / needs data / paper evidence
follow-upCan ballot images be compared against CVR or tabulator interpretation?
- Scope
- ballot image
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed for independent CVR/image interpretation checks.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonBallot-level retabulation
Wisconsin: Cast vote recordsWI / partial / paper evidence
source noteCan ballot-level machine interpretations be independently retabulated?
- Scope
- county availability scaffold
- Status
- availability scaffold only no cvr loaded
- Evidence needed
- Documents request path; no ballot-level retabulation can be performed until CVRs are obtained.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Cast vote recordsLocal artifact
data/wi-2024-cvr-availability.csvMachine event log review
Arizona: Tabulator and EMS logsAZ / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review machine events, uploads, adjudication, media handling, and timing anomalies.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Tabulator and EMS logsElectronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonMachine event log review
Georgia: Tabulator and EMS logsGA / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review machine events, uploads, adjudication, media handling, and timing anomalies.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonMachine event log review
Massachusetts: Tabulator and EMS logsMA / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review scanner, EMS, upload, memory-device, adjudication, and timing records for any municipality where advisory gaps remain after normal roll-off controls.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonMachine event log review
Michigan: Tabulator and EMS logsMI / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review machine events, uploads, adjudication, media handling, and timing anomalies.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonMachine event log review
North Carolina: Tabulator and EMS logsNC / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review machine events, uploads, adjudication, media handling, and timing anomalies.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonMachine event log review
Nevada: Tabulator and EMS logsNV / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review machine events, uploads, adjudication, media handling, and timing anomalies.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonMachine event log review
Pennsylvania: Tabulator and EMS logsPA / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review machine events, uploads, adjudication, media handling, and timing anomalies.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonMachine event log review
Texas: Tabulator and EMS logsTX / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review machine events, uploads, adjudication, media handling, and timing anomalies.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonMachine event log review
Wisconsin: Tabulator and EMS logsWI / needs data / machine logs
follow-upDo tabulator or EMS logs explain timing, upload, adjudication, or media anomalies?
- Scope
- tabulator or ems
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to review machine events, uploads, adjudication, media handling, and timing anomalies.
Tabulator and election-management-system logs help reconstruct configuration, upload, adjudication, and event timing alongside other official records.
Machine-log gaps can also come from vendor export limits, retention schedules, redaction review, fragmented county systems, or logs that require a formal request.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPost-election audit window
Arizona: Audit recordsAZ / partial / audit
source noteCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- county hand count summary
- Status
- official hand count summary identified detailed unit workpapers not normalized
- Evidence needed
- Official hand-count summaries provide county-level audit context, but detailed audit-unit workpapers and machine-vs-hand count fields are still needed before treating advisory rows as cleared or confirmed.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Audit recordsLocal artifact
data/az-2024-admin-source-inventory.jsonPost-election audit window
Georgia: Audit recordsGA / needs data / audit
follow-upCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- audit unit
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare electronic tabulation against paper or audit evidence without treating aggregate audit summaries as per-unit clearance.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPost-election audit window
Massachusetts: Audit recordsMA / partial / audit
source noteCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- statewide audit summary
- Status
- official statewide post election audit page identified detailed unit workpapers not loaded
- Evidence needed
- Provides official audit context, but detailed municipal, precinct, batch, contest, and discrepancy workpapers are still needed before treating advisory directional screens as cleared or confirmed.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Audit recordsElectronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPost-election audit window
Michigan: Audit recordsMI / needs data / audit
follow-upCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- audit unit
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare electronic tabulation against paper or audit evidence without treating aggregate audit summaries as per-unit clearance.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPost-election audit window
North Carolina: Audit recordsNC / needs data / audit
follow-upCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- audit unit
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare electronic tabulation against paper or audit evidence without treating aggregate audit summaries as per-unit clearance.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPost-election audit window
Nevada: Audit recordsNV / needs data / audit
follow-upCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- audit unit
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare electronic tabulation against paper or audit evidence without treating aggregate audit summaries as per-unit clearance.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPost-election audit window
Pennsylvania: Audit recordsPA / needs data / audit
follow-upCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- audit unit
- Status
- not inventoried
- Evidence needed
- Needed to compare electronic tabulation against paper or audit evidence without treating aggregate audit summaries as per-unit clearance.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Electronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPost-election audit window
Texas: Audit recordsTX / partial / audit
source noteCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- selected county state audit
- Status
- selected counties public audit program context loaded no unit workpapers
- Evidence needed
- Documents the SOS-selected 2023-2024 audit counties and published preliminary 2024 Val Verde findings, but does not provide statewide per-unit audit workpapers or outcomes.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Audit recordsElectronic integrity registry
data/electronic-integrity-artifacts.jsonPost-election audit window
Wisconsin: Audit recordsWI / partial / audit
source noteCan paper or audit evidence independently confirm the electronic tabulation?
- Scope
- selected reporting unit
- Status
- selected units loaded per unit outcomes not published
- Evidence needed
- Shows which reporting units were selected and aggregate audit findings; does not clear individual flagged units.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Audit recordsLocal artifact
data/wi-2024-audit-selections.csvExternal litigation checkpoint
New York: Rockland County lawsuit appeal notedNY / external litigation / records request
follow-upWhat election records and judicial findings are actually at issue in the Rockland County, New York lawsuit and appeal?
- Scope
- Rockland County litigation
- Status
- Smart Elections states that it filed an appeal in a Rockland County, New York lawsuit challenging the 2024 election, with page dates showing June 26, 2025 and May 29, 2025 milestones.
- Evidence needed
- Court filings, county canvass records, ballot-preservation records, machine logs, CVRs if available, and any audit or recount records cited in the Rockland County case.
Request records document what was sought, which office holds it, response timing, fees or exemptions, and any remaining access gap.
Records-request delays can also come from normal queue backlogs, fee estimates, custodian handoffs, legal review, holidays, or unclear public-records procedures.
External analysis collection
ETA: 2024 election analysis indexALL / external review / results
source noteWhich ETA 2024 analysis pages map to states already in this timeline, and can each be reproduced from official published data?
- Scope
- multi-state ETA analysis index
- Status
- Election Truth Alliance publishes a 2024 U.S. election analysis index. This entry links that source collection for reproducibility review.
- Evidence needed
- Official source data for each analysis page, reproducible scripts or notebooks, and county/precinct result exports matching the versions used by ETA.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
External state analysis
Nevada: ETA Clark County analysisNV / external review / results
source noteCan ETA's Nevada analysis be reproduced from Clark County official results, and do official administrative records explain the highlighted pattern?
- Scope
- Clark County, Nevada analysis
- Status
- Election Truth Alliance publishes a Nevada analysis page focused on Clark County. The timeline treats it as a source-backed state review prompt.
- Evidence needed
- Clark County precinct results, turnout files, ballot-style or contest participation data, CVRs if available, and official audit documentation.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
External state analysis
Pennsylvania: ETA state analysisPA / external review / results
source noteWhich Pennsylvania counties drive ETA's published concerns, and are the patterns reproducible from official county and state data?
- Scope
- Pennsylvania analysis
- Status
- Election Truth Alliance publishes a Pennsylvania analysis page. This creates a sourced checkpoint for reproducing the analysis against official Pennsylvania records.
- Evidence needed
- Pennsylvania precinct results, county canvass exports, voting-method turnout, ballot-style data, CVRs where available, and official audit or recount records.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
External integrity-concerns statement
ETA: 2024 U.S. integrity concernsALL / external records concern / records request
follow-upWhich ETA-listed concerns are tied to specific official records, and which remain general advocacy claims needing jurisdiction-level evidence?
- Scope
- national integrity-concerns statement
- Status
- Election Truth Alliance's dated integrity-concerns page flags precinct-pattern, CVR-availability, chain-of-custody, and public-records issues as items it says merit investigation.
- Evidence needed
- Outstanding public-records request logs, CVR availability records, tabulator incident reports, chain-of-custody documentation, and official responses from the jurisdictions named by ETA.
Request records document what was sought, which office holds it, response timing, fees or exemptions, and any remaining access gap.
Records-request delays can also come from normal queue backlogs, fee estimates, custodian handoffs, legal review, holidays, or unclear public-records procedures.
External state analysis
North Carolina: ETA longform analysisNC / external review / results
source noteCan ETA's North Carolina analysis be reproduced from official data, and do official election-administration records explain the highlighted precinct patterns?
- Scope
- North Carolina analysis
- Status
- Election Truth Alliance publishes a longform North Carolina 2024 analysis page. The entry marks it as a reproducibility and official-record review target.
- Evidence needed
- North Carolina precinct results, county canvass data, ballot-style and turnout records, machine logs where relevant, and official audit documentation.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
External litigation checkpoint
Pennsylvania: ETA legal summary and filing checkpointPA / external litigation / records request
follow-upWhat claims and source records are actually presented in ETA's Pennsylvania legal summary and linked filing?
- Scope
- Pennsylvania legal summary
- Status
- Election Truth Alliance publishes a Pennsylvania legal summary with a dated filing checkpoint and links to lawsuit materials. The timeline records it as a litigation-source milestone.
- Evidence needed
- Filed complaint, docket entries, relief requested, cited election records, and any official state or county responses to the lawsuit's factual allegations.
Request records document what was sought, which office holds it, response timing, fees or exemptions, and any remaining access gap.
Records-request delays can also come from normal queue backlogs, fee estimates, custodian handoffs, legal review, holidays, or unclear public-records procedures.
Records request operation
National: draft request packet generatedALL / draft ready / records request
source noteWhich unresolved evidence gaps have draft records requests ready to send?
- Scope
- multi-state evidence inventory
- Status
- 58 draft-ready request rows across 9 states
- Evidence needed
- Send and track public-records requests for unresolved electronic evidence families.
Request records document what was sought, which office holds it, response timing, fees or exemptions, and any remaining access gap.
Records-request delays can also come from normal queue backlogs, fee estimates, custodian handoffs, legal review, holidays, or unclear public-records procedures.
Electronic integrity request tracker
data/electronic-integrity-request-tracker.jsonRequest operation snapshotdata/electronic-integrity-request-operations.jsonAudit context snapshot
Arizona: Audit contextAZ / partial / audit
follow-upWhat administration context is already documented for Arizona, and what remains incomplete?
- Scope
- state administration context
- Status
- Arizona SOS 2024 Election Information identifies county hand-count documents and statuses: 13 counties completed hand counts, two were not performed because required party participation was not designated, and completed counties are summarized as no discrepancies or within the acceptable margin. Detailed audit-unit rows and workpapers are not normalized. County hand-count summary context is not per-unit audit clearance and is not proof of fraud or misconduct.
- Evidence needed
- Arizona SOS 2024 Election Information identifies county hand-count documents and statuses: 13 counties completed hand counts, two were not performed because required party participation was not designated, and completed counties are summarized as no discrepancies or within the acceptable margin. Detailed audit-unit rows and workpapers are not normalized.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Arizona Audit contextLocal artifact
data/az-2024-admin-source-inventory.jsonSwing-state parity registrydata/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonSource collection snapshot
Arizona: county review coverage against United States SenatorAZ / partial parity / results
follow-upWhat official source grain supports Arizona's current local review workflow?
- Scope
- county tier 6 official pdf hostile
- Status
- native county review package loaded. Arizona review rows are county-level President-versus-U.S. Senate comparisons from signed canvass county totals. They are useful for statewide county review, but they are not precinct-level vote-share scatter plots.
- Evidence needed
- 15 result rows, 15 review rows, 15 turnout rows. Next action: Find and normalize official subcounty President plus comparison-contest rows; keep the newly inventoried hand-count, recount/litigation, and records-request paths as administration context until detailed rows are collected.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Arizona official sourceArizona official sourceArizona official sourceArizona official sourceArizona official sourceSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonCVR availability snapshot
Arizona: CVR contextAZ / candidate / paper evidence
source noteWhat administration context is already documented for Arizona, and what remains incomplete?
- Scope
- state administration context
- Status
- The Arizona SOS public-records portal and county election contact directory are documented as request paths for CVRs or equivalent ballot-level exports, ballot images, tabulator/EMS logs, L&A records, and custody records. No AZ CVR or ballot-image dataset is loaded. Request-path inventory only; county custody and lawful releasability must be confirmed before CVR retabulation.
- Evidence needed
- The Arizona SOS public-records portal and county election contact directory are documented as request paths for CVRs or equivalent ballot-level exports, ballot images, tabulator/EMS logs, L&A records, and custody records. No AZ CVR or ballot-image dataset is loaded.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Arizona CVR contextLocal artifact
data/az-2024-admin-source-inventory.jsonSwing-state parity registrydata/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonIncident context snapshot
Arizona: Incident and custody contextAZ / partial / custody
follow-upWhat administration context is already documented for Arizona, and what remains incomplete?
- Scope
- state administration context
- Status
- The Arizona SOS litigation page identifies a 2024 general-election recount/election-contest row for Maricopa County Superior Court case CV2024-033532 with no change in outcome and links pending election-related dockets. Normalized incident, correction, recount, and litigation rows are not loaded. The identified recount involved Legislative District 2, Maricopa County Supervisor District 3, and Fountain Hills Town Council contests, not President or U.S. Senate. Docket links are context and request leads only.
- Evidence needed
- The Arizona SOS litigation page identifies a 2024 general-election recount/election-contest row for Maricopa County Superior Court case CV2024-033532 with no change in outcome and links pending election-related dockets. Normalized incident, correction, recount, and litigation rows are not loaded.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Arizona Incident and custody contextLocal artifact
data/az-2024-admin-source-inventory.jsonSwing-state parity registrydata/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonSource collection snapshot
Georgia: precinct review coverageGA / partial parity / results
follow-upWhat official source grain supports Georgia's current local review workflow?
- Scope
- precinct tier 2 official dashboard endpoint
- Status
- native precinct vote-share review package loaded. Georgia native review rows use official Georgia Secretary of State media-export precinct presidential vote-share screening only. No same-row down-ballot comparison contest is mapped in this package. County presidential candidate rows sum 19 votes higher than the statewide presidential contest total, all in minor-party/other rows, and 17 zero-total precinct entries are omitted from review charts.
- Evidence needed
- 159 result rows, 2,684 review rows, 159 turnout rows. Next action: Map an official same-grain comparison contest, then rerun indicator counts.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Georgia official sourceSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonSource collection snapshot
Michigan: precinct review coverage against United States SenatorMI / native review near parity admin context missing / results
follow-upWhat official source grain supports Michigan's current local review workflow?
- Scope
- precinct tier 1 official export database
- Status
- native precinct review package loaded. Michigan native review rows use precinct-level presidential vote-share screening and presidential-versus-U.S. Senate same-party drop-off screening. Precinct boundary geometry is not included in this package.
- Evidence needed
- 83 result rows, 4,428 review rows, 83 turnout rows. Next action: Add Wisconsin-style audit/CVR/incident inventories and a public-source evidence probe; keep current native flags visible while context catches up.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Michigan official sourceSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonSource collection snapshot
North Carolina: precinct_review_county_certified review coverage against North Carolina GovernorNC / partial parity / results
follow-upWhat official source grain supports North Carolina's current local review workflow?
- Scope
- precinct review county certified tier 1 official export database
- Status
- native county certified package loaded; review rows filtered to official Real Precinct=Y rows. North Carolina native review rows use the official NCSBE Real Precinct=Y filter for precinct-only presidential vote-share screening and presidential-versus-Governor same-party drop-off screening. Certified county totals still aggregate all official reporting units, including early voting, absentee, provisional, and transfer rows. The comparison contest is Governor, not U.S. Senate, because North Carolina did not have a 2024 U.S. Senate race.
- Evidence needed
- 100 result rows, 2,658 review rows, 100 turnout rows. Next action: Add Wisconsin-style audit/CVR/incident inventories and a public-source evidence probe; keep current native flags visible while context catches up.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
North Carolina official sourceSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonCVR availability snapshot
Nevada: CVR contextNV / partial / paper evidence
follow-upWhat administration context is already documented for Nevada, and what remains incomplete?
- Scope
- state administration context
- Status
- Clark County, Washoe County, and Humboldt County 2024 General CVRs are publicly linked by official county elections sites and normalized to precinct President-versus-U.S. Senate review rows. CVR availability for the other 14 Nevada jurisdictions is still not inventoried. Normalized precinct aggregates only; the raw Humboldt County CVR is committed, while raw Clark and Washoe county CVR exports are not committed. County CVR totals may differ from certified county totals.
- Evidence needed
- Clark County, Washoe County, and Humboldt County 2024 General CVRs are publicly linked by official county elections sites and normalized to precinct President-versus-U.S. Senate review rows. CVR availability for the other 14 Nevada jurisdictions is still not inventoried.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Nevada CVR contextLocal artifact
data/nv-humboldt-2024-general-cvr-precinct-review.csvSwing-state parity registrydata/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonSource collection snapshot
Nevada: precinct review coverage against United States SenatorNV / partial parity / results
follow-upWhat official source grain supports Nevada's current local review workflow?
- Scope
- precinct tier 2 official dashboard endpoint
- Status
- native partial subcounty review package loaded. Nevada review rows now include Clark County, Washoe County, and Humboldt County official CVR precinct President-versus-U.S. Senate rows. The rest of Nevada remains county-level statewide-results context, and county CVR totals may differ from certified county totals, so statewide conclusions still require source-row inspection and additional county local exports.
- Evidence needed
- 17 result rows, 1,057 review rows, 17 turnout rows. Next action: Add official local exports for the remaining 14 Nevada jurisdictions and collect state-native turnout plus audit/CVR/L&A/tabulator-log/custody/incident evidence; keep current native flags visible while context catches up.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Nevada official sourceNevada official sourceNevada official sourceNevada official sourceNevada official sourceNevada official sourceNevada official sourceSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonSource collection snapshot
Pennsylvania: precinct review coverage against United States SenatorPA / native review near parity admin context missing / results
follow-upWhat official source grain supports Pennsylvania's current local review workflow?
- Scope
- precinct tier 1 official export database
- Status
- native precinct review package loaded. Pennsylvania native review rows use precinct-level presidential vote-share screening and presidential-versus-U.S. Senate same-party drop-off screening. Two presidential precinct groups do not have Senate rows and are kept as vote-share-only rows.
- Evidence needed
- 67 result rows, 9,154 review rows, 67 turnout rows. Next action: Add Wisconsin-style audit/CVR/incident inventories and a public-source evidence probe; keep current native flags visible while context catches up.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Pennsylvania official sourceSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonAudit context snapshot
Texas: Audit contextTX / partial / audit
follow-upWhat administration context is already documented for Texas, and what remains incomplete?
- Scope
- state administration context
- Status
- Texas SOS audit program identifies the 2023-2024 audit counties and publishes preliminary 2024 Val Verde findings, but statewide per-unit audit workpapers and outcomes are not normalized.
- Evidence needed
- Texas SOS audit program identifies the 2023-2024 audit counties and publishes preliminary 2024 Val Verde findings, but statewide per-unit audit workpapers and outcomes are not normalized.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Texas Audit contextSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonSource collection snapshot
Texas: precinct review coverage against United States SenatorTX / native review near parity admin context missing / results
follow-upWhat official source grain supports Texas's current local review workflow?
- Scope
- precinct tier 3 sanctioned bulk partial
- Status
- texasCountyJsonVtdReview loaded with VTD write-in reconciliation summary. Texas native review rows use Capitol Data Portal VTD-level 2024 General Election President-versus-U.S. Senate rows. Certified county result rows remain sourced from Texas SOS County.json. The VTD presidential rows aggregate to 11,404,528 votes, 15,854 above the SOS county certified-result package total of 11,388,674. Reconciliation shows the gap is primarily a write-in scope difference: VTD rows include 24,730 generic Write-In votes, while SOS certified county rows include 8,569 named declared write-in candidate votes. Use VTD rows as official local screening context rather than replacement certified totals.
- Evidence needed
- 254 result rows, 9,348 review rows, 9,712 turnout rows. Next action: Add Wisconsin-style audit/CVR/incident inventories and a public-source evidence probe; keep current native flags visible while context catches up.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Texas official sourceSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonAudit context snapshot
Wisconsin: Audit contextWI / partial / audit
follow-upWhat administration context is already documented for Wisconsin, and what remains incomplete?
- Scope
- state administration context
- Status
- Official WEC 2024 post-election voting equipment audit report is collected and Appendix B selected reporting units are normalized. The report provides statewide findings and aggregate discussion, but not a per-reporting-unit discrepancy outcome table. Selection rows and statewide findings are loaded as audit context. Per-unit discrepancy outcomes are not published in this report and are not loaded.
- Evidence needed
- Official WEC 2024 post-election voting equipment audit report is collected and Appendix B selected reporting units are normalized. The report provides statewide findings and aggregate discussion, but not a per-reporting-unit discrepancy outcome table.
Audit records document the scope and method of an independent check and support comparison of machine-tabulated outcomes with paper evidence.
Audit gaps can also come from aggregate-only publication, different retention rules, delayed local paperwork, or records that exist but have not been normalized yet.
Wisconsin Audit contextLocal artifact
data/wi-2024-audit/2024-post-election-voting-equipment-audit-final-report.pdfSwing-state parity registrydata/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonCVR availability snapshot
Wisconsin: CVR contextWI / partial / paper evidence
follow-upWhat administration context is already documented for Wisconsin, and what remains incomplete?
- Scope
- state administration context
- Status
- A 72-county CVR availability tracking scaffold exists, but county availability/request paths have not all been verified and no CVR data is loaded. CVR availability inventory scaffold only; not a CVR dataset.
- Evidence needed
- A 72-county CVR availability tracking scaffold exists, but county availability/request paths have not all been verified and no CVR data is loaded.
Cast-vote records, ballot images where lawful, and retained paper records support comparison of electronic interpretations with voter-mark evidence.
Paper-evidence gaps can also come from legal limits on ballot images or CVRs, privacy review, scanner settings, storage practices, or records that are obtainable only locally.
Wisconsin CVR contextLocal artifact
data/wi-2024-cvr-availability.csvSwing-state parity registrydata/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonIncident context snapshot
Wisconsin: Incident and custody contextWI / candidate / custody
source noteWhat administration context is already documented for Wisconsin, and what remains incomplete?
- Scope
- state administration context
- Status
- WEC 2024 general-election source location is identified for incident/correction follow-up, but official incident/recount/litigation rows have not been normalized yet. Candidate source inventory only; not a loaded incident dataset.
- Evidence needed
- WEC 2024 general-election source location is identified for incident/correction follow-up, but official incident/recount/litigation rows have not been normalized yet.
Custody records help reconstruct who handled ballots, equipment, and removable media, when transfers occurred, and whether required documentation is complete.
Custody gaps can also come from decentralized local recordkeeping, paper forms not yet digitized, clerical omissions, or records held by a different custodian.
Wisconsin Incident and custody contextLocal artifact
data/wi-2024-incident-context.csvSwing-state parity registrydata/swing-state-2024-parity-status.jsonSource collection snapshot
Wisconsin: ward review coverage against United States SenatorWI / benchmark tableable with records requests remaining / results
source noteWhat official source grain supports Wisconsin's current local review workflow?
- Scope
- ward tier 1 official export database
- Status
- native ward review package loaded with historical baseline and partial audit context. Wisconsin native review rows use ward-level presidential vote-share screening and presidential-versus-U.S. Senate same-party drop-off screening. Turnout rows use EAC 2024 V2 local-jurisdiction fallback data because the WEC ward results workbook does not include registered-voter denominator fields.
- Evidence needed
- 72 result rows, 3,503 review rows, 1,851 turnout rows. Next action: Table Wisconsin until records-request responses arrive; keep county flags authoritative and use loaded audit/CVR/geometry items as context only.
Local result rows support reconciliation across precinct, ward, batch, county, and statewide publications and help document corrections or format changes.
Result-localization gaps can also come from county-only publication, precinct consolidation, late corrected exports, formatting changes, or dashboards without bulk downloads.
Wisconsin official sourceSwing-state parity registry
data/swing-state-2024-parity-status.json